POLICY PAPER | EU Platform workers‘ directive: A test for regulating the future of work
A policy paper by our research intern Silke Maes entitled "EU Platform workers' directive: A test for regulating the future of work" takes a closer look at the aforementioned Directive on improving working conditions at work through platforms. The paper details the impact of the development of platforms on working conditions and then argues that the Directive is the first EU attempt to respond to this development.
“There is an intense debate in the literature on whether the reclassification of platform workers to employees is possible and even desirable.”
The full article can be found under the PDF button.
Related articles
- National Convention on the EU | Background material: The European Political Community and its future potential
- Windsor framework and future EU-UK relations: Could personal diplomacy be the driving engine?
- POLICY PAPER | The EU-Mercosur trade agreement, will it ever reach a green end?
- Report | EU-China relations - Will the current crisis change the relationship between the two great powers?
- POLICY PAPER | The New Pact on Migration and Asylum and the war in Ukraine: time for a paradigm shift?
- Report | Monitoring of the EU's Green Policies: Perceptions and Narratives in the Czech and Slovak Information Space
- Policy Paper | Serbia and Its Foreign Policy Alignment after the War in Ukraine
- Policy Paper | Trust in the EU in times of crisis: Public perceptions in the Czech Republic in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic
- POLICY PAPER | Soaring electricity prices and development in the EU; the electricity market design under scrutiny?
- EU MONITOR | The future shift of energy policies in the European Union
- Blog | Business-as-usual between Germany and China as a disruptive element for the European Union
- Blog | European Media Freedom Act
- Blog | New Hope on the Horizon? The Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and the European Union's Struggle Towards a Diplomatic Victory
- National Convention on the EU | Recommendation: Ukraine's Integration into the EU
- Policy Paper: Evaluating Transatlantic Relations in Times of Conflict
- Report: EU - Pacific talks: EU - ASEAN relations: For better and for worse
- National Convention on the EU | Integraction of Ukraine into the EU
- BLOG | How do Czech and Slovak governmental parties perceive the EU's green deal? Online monitoring of Facebook posts
- EU MONITOR: The European Union’s Position Toward Ukraine’s EU Membership
- BLOG: The Militarization of Europe: Three Reasons the EU’s Defense Strategy Changed
- Blog: Discrimination Is Not A Tradition: Case of Poland
- Policy Brief: New Resources of the EU Budget
- Policy Brief: Reducing poverty in the Visegrad countries
- REPORT: Stocktaking and Evaluating EU defence cooperation – expectations and the role of the V4
- REPORT: EU – Japan Strategic dialogue: climate change cooperation as a pathway to the future
- Policy Paper: Czechia’s Policies within the EU in the Context of the Upcoming Presidency to the EU Council
- UPDATE: Czech perception of the EU’s COVID-19 response
- UPDATE: Czech Perception of the EU Climate Policy
- Policy Paper: Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development: A troubleshooting guide for reluctant EU donors
- REPORT: 30 Years of Visegrad: Role of the V4 countries in shaping the future of the EU
- EU MONITOR: Geothermal energy and the Visegrad group
- EASTERN MONITOR: A new methodology for the same problems: Is the future of the enlargement process lost?
- EU MONITOR: Long-term Sustainability of Healthy Labour Market in EU Population Development, Immigration Stress, and their Impact
- Evaluating Transatlantic Relations – For better or for worse?
- National Convention on the EU: EU relations with the Eastern Neighbourhood
- EU – Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: Strengthening economic ties as a way out of recession
- Policy Paper: Green Transformation: reconfiguration of consumption in Norway and the Czech Republic in a more sustainable direction
- RECOMMENDATION: National Convention on the EU: Sustainable mobility in the context of the "Fit for 55" package
- RECOMMENDATION: National Convention on the EU: Programme of the Presidency Trio France - Czech Republic - Sweden
- REPORT: The V4 towards a new NATO Strategic Concept and the EU Strategic Compass
- Policy Paper: Topics: Czech 2022 Presidency to the Council of the EU
- Is climate litigation paving the way for a more effective and fair climate governance?
- Blog: Renewed EU–Southern neighbourhood agenda: is economical aid a right tool to achieve EU’s targets?
- EU MONITOR: Is EU leading the way to becoming a global change in business and human rights?
- Making Flexible Europe Work? European Governance and the Potential of Differentiated Cooperation
- Commentary: EU – Western Balkans summit - More reforms, more money
- Coronavirus in Belgium – beyond the alarming statistics
- European Green Deal is not going to end, it is useless to swim against the tide
- EU MONITOR: Backsliding of democracy in Slovenia under right-wing populist Janez Janša
- Brief on COVID-19: European integration continues on several fronts as the COVID-19 crisis escalates. Without the Czech Republic
- EU crisis response in tackling COVID-19. Views from the Member States
- EU MONITOR: French lessons in Africa: An assessment of three key military capabilities for European defence
- Brief on COVID-19: Eurozone in Agreement over the first COVID19-Response
- Brief on COVID-19: National governments, not the EU, sleepwalked into the corona crisis
- EU MONITOR: Czech Perception of the EU Defence Policy
- Brief on COVID-19: Do Czechs Want a Stronger EU or a Convenient Scapegoat ?
- EU MONITOR: Examining Central and Eastern Europe’s Climate Policy through a Security Lens
- What’s wrong with the EU policy towards North Korea and how to fix it
- Convergence of the EU and Turkey are at freezing point – causes and consequence?
- EU MONITOR: Has the time come for a Czech Regional Policy?
- Czechs and the EU Brand: How do Czechs feel about the EU and what could change their mind?
- POLICY PAPER: Serbia's state of play regarding Chapters 23 and 24: One step forward, two steps back
- EU MONITOR: MFF Negotiations: What Czechs think of the latest development
- Why nuclear alone is not the answer to climate change?
- INTRODUCTION: Launch of the new website "15 years in the EU"
- Climate diplomacy: actions for strengthening the EU leadership role in forest protection and sustainable development
- Free trade agreement EU-MERCOSUR: Essence, challenges and expectations
- Between moderate progress and prolonged stagnation: The European Commission’s Reports on the Western Balkans
- Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un need the European Union
- Konzervativci a brexitový poker: Přichází čas Borise Johnsona?
- RECOMMENDATIONS: Setting the future relationship with the UK after Brexit
- Analysis Of the Activity Of the Czech MEPs During the 2014–2019 Term
- IFAT: How Could the European Elections Reshape Central Europe’s Role in the EU?
- Blízkému spojenectví navzdory: Polsko-litevské vztahy ve 21. století
- RECOMMENDATIONS: Priroties of Czech Republic for summit in Sibiu
- Les procédures de «l’article 7» contre la Pologne et la Hongrie: Quels effets concrets ?
- The Changing Balance of Power in the EU after the British Referendum – V4 Capacities and Opportunities
- The Secrets of the Trade Secret Directive
- Austrian border plan damaging symbolic Brenner Pass
- Big Deal about no Big Deal
- EU has a role to play in the Syria Peace Talks II.
- Another challenge for Europe: Fighting irregular warfare & exploitation of the NSAs
- Enlargement and citizenship: looking into the future - Czech Republic
EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy
Staroměstské náměstí 4/1
Prague 1 - Staré Město
110 00
tel.: +420 212 246 552
email: europeum@europeum.org
https://www.europeum.org
Staroměstské náměstí 4/1
Prague 1 - Staré Město
110 00
tel.: +420 212 246 552
email: europeum@europeum.org
https://www.europeum.org