Agnieszka Cianciara authored a policy paper on the topic of differentiation in the EU from the standpoint of the Visegrad Group.
At the EU level, V4 emerged as a politically relevant bloc in the aftermath of the migration crisis in 2015. However, there are a number of important factors that differentiate V4 countries, thus resulting in diverse preferences and reducing the cohesion of the bloc. They help to explain differentiated participation in DI projects but also shape divergent positions with regard to the 'Future of Europe', beyond the lowest common denominator as expressed in the V4 statement from January 2018.
Whereas infringements of EU secondary laws are nothing new and virtually all member states have been subjected to infringement procedures before the Court in one area or another, justifications given for non-compliance by the states in question provide an important case in point. Namely, the argument is that the mandatory relocation scheme fuelled 'anti-migrant sentiment and played into the hands of the far right' (Czech prime minister Andrej Babis) and that the relocation decision taken by qualified majority (as allowed by the treaties) should not have been taken - the fact that a legal instrument exists does not mean that it should be used (Polish minister for European affairs Konrad Szymanski).
You can download the whole policy paper through the PDF button on the right of this article.#V4 #Visegrad Group #Czech Republic #Slovakia #Poland #Hungary